Welcome to the new-and-improved KingDavid8.com! I finally have all of the contents from my old site transferred here, so everything should be working properly. Please let me know if you find any "dead links". My pages also have boxes where readers can leave comments and criticisms, so don't be shy.
This website is mostly aimed at providing arguments and evidence for the non-Christian, the Christian who may be struggling with what he or she believes, or those Christians who are interested in reaching out to others.
My opinions may contradict what other Christians believe, but many of my arguments are also based on arguments given by a variety of Christian sources. I especially owe a debt of gratitude to the writings of Glenn Miller, J.P. Holding, Paul Maier, Grant R. Jeffrey, Lee Strobel, and Gerald Schroeder.
Please feel free to borrow ideas or arguments of mine (since many of them were not mine to begin with). I do ask that if you quote from my site directly, to please credit me.

Nope. The relevant passage is 1 Kings 7:23 which says "And he (Hiram) made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about." Critics love to point out that if it was ten cubits across, and thirty cubits around, then this would mean that pi equals three, when it actually equals about 3.14.
First of all, the circumference equally exactly pi times the diameter is only true of perfect circles (which only exist in theory). Try making a circular object yourself, and you'll find that the circumference will only be roughly pi times the diameter. It may be 3 times as great. It may be 3.3 times as great. Especially if you make the object without using any more measuring tools than Hiram used (his measuring tool was likely his forearm, since that is how cubits were measured).
Also, pi equalling 3.14 itself is an approximation, as is 3. Why is 3.14 an appropriate approximation, while 3 itself is not? No one has ever written, or even calculated, the exact number for pi, since there is no exact number (it would be eternal). Three is correct within 95% of the actual value, while 3.14 is correct within 99.9% of the actual value. So who decides what kind of rounding off is close enough? Do the critics really expect this passage to end with, "....and a line of 31.4159265 (etc, etc.) cubits did compass it round about"?
Everyone approximates. When a financial report says a company is worth 10 billion dollars, do people complain that the company is actually worth $9,824,023,855.03? Even those pointing out the 'error' here are approximating in whatever value they express for pi. There are many examples in the Bible of obvious approximations. For example, the populations given in Numbers Chapter 2 always end with even hundreds, or in some cases fifties. Are we expected to believe that each population came out to such exact numbers? Nope, that is yet another example of approximations in the Bible.
Approximation is not considered an error, so there is no error in this passage.