Welcome to the new-and-improved KingDavid8.com! I finally have all of the contents from my old site transferred here, so everything should be working properly. Please let me know if you find any "dead links". My pages also have boxes where readers can leave comments and criticisms, so don't be shy.
This website is mostly aimed at providing arguments and evidence for the non-Christian, the Christian who may be struggling with what he or she believes, or those Christians who are interested in reaching out to others.
My opinions may contradict what other Christians believe, but many of my arguments are also based on arguments given by a variety of Christian sources. I especially owe a debt of gratitude to the writings of Glenn Miller, J.P. Holding, Paul Maier, Grant R. Jeffrey, Lee Strobel, and Gerald Schroeder.
Please feel free to borrow ideas or arguments of mine (since many of them were not mine to begin with). I do ask that if you quote from my site directly, to please credit me.
Probably.
The text in question is a historical text called "Chronicles", which the Greek historian Phlegon wrote around 140 A.D., but, over time, has become completely lost, as have most of his writings. Origen (185-254 A.D.) was a Christian scholar, who, in his written response to the pagan Celsus in 248 A.D., made reference to"Chronicles". Origen says, "Now Phlegon, in the thirteenth or fourteenth book, I think, of his Chronicles, not only ascribed to Jesus a knowledge of future events (although falling into confusion about some things which refer to Peter, as if they referred to Jesus), but also testified that the result corresponded to His predictions." (Origen, XIV) He later quotes a passage from Chronicles, saying, “Jesus, while alive was of no assistance to himself, but that he arose after death, and exhibited the marks of his punishment, and showed how his hands had been pierced by nails.” (Origen, LIX).
Is there any reason to believe that Origen was fabricating these bits, putting words into Phlegon's texts that weren't really there? It's unlikely. Though "Chronicles" is lost now, it wasn't at the time, having been only about a century old. Had Origen been lying about what Phlegon wrote, it would have quite easy for his audience to have found out. Also, Origen was a very respected teacher and philosopher, and has not shown any signs of such dishonesty in his writings. There are also things in those two references which would have been very odd for Origen to have made up, noting that Phlegon had confused Peter and Jesus at times, and saying that Jesus was "of no assistance to himself" while alive.