All I can say is you have an immense amount of patience dealing with some of these extremely hostile, stubborn, arrogant and vitriolic Christ-mythers. Especially that Jay, dude. I wouldn't have the tolerance to unequivocally define my criteria for evidence like you have, only to have it repeatedly ignored. It's exasperating just reading the email exchanges let alone have to respond to them. What I find interesting is a lot of them seem to consider themselves "intellectuals" yet they have such embarrassingly poor debate skills. Spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and proof reading are also serious struggles. It's interesting how the concept of underpinning an argument with strong, valid evidence versus repeated claims supported occasionally with weak evidence seems to continually elude them. I'm not certain why that's such a difficult concept to grasp, yet typically, it seems to be. Anyway, good for you for being able to cope with their childish frustration and vilification when you insist they provide you with some evidence.